1 |
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 05:20:01PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:37:51 -0500, Indi wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > > that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Hmm, I always thought the "-v" was the verbose switch, and that it |
7 |
> > should work properly regardless of what's in make.conf. It *used* to |
8 |
> > work properly here, I've been using "emerge -vauND world" to update for |
9 |
> > ages... |
10 |
> |
11 |
> -v affects the verbosity of emerge, not of gcc, the output of which is |
12 |
> still hidden. Thisis a useful distinction, I prefer to see everything that |
13 |
> portage has to tell me without spamming my screen with gcc output. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> > > If you want the old |
16 |
> > > behaviour back, you can add |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > to your make.conf |
21 |
> |
22 |
> > Even including this in make.conf, I still get "quiet-build mode": |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
25 |
> > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--verbose" |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > The only thing that works is manually using "--quiet-build=n" on the |
28 |
> > command line, so it seems the real problem here is "emerge ignoring |
29 |
> > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS entries in make.conf". |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Is it that your second setting overrides the first? Try putting all the |
32 |
> settings in one variable assignation. |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
Thanks Neil, that was exactly it. |
36 |
You wouldn't believe some of the serious, major problems I've overcome on |
37 |
my own -- but whenever I do have to ask for help, it seems it's usually for |
38 |
something obvious and stupid. |
39 |
|
40 |
Oh well, if I never made mistakes I'd just be harder to live with.... |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
caveat utilitor |
44 |
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ |