Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: Emerge ignoring make.conf entries [was Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ignoring -v switch]
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:41:30
Message-Id: 20111203163954.GA25863@gaurahari.merseine.nu
1 On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 05:20:01PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:37:51 -0500, Indi wrote:
3 >
4 > > > that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build.
5 > >
6 > > Hmm, I always thought the "-v" was the verbose switch, and that it
7 > > should work properly regardless of what's in make.conf. It *used* to
8 > > work properly here, I've been using "emerge -vauND world" to update for
9 > > ages...
10 >
11 > -v affects the verbosity of emerge, not of gcc, the output of which is
12 > still hidden. Thisis a useful distinction, I prefer to see everything that
13 > portage has to tell me without spamming my screen with gcc output.
14 >
15 > > > If you want the old
16 > > > behaviour back, you can add
17 > > >
18 > > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
19 > > >
20 > > > to your make.conf
21 >
22 > > Even including this in make.conf, I still get "quiet-build mode":
23 > >
24 > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
25 > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--verbose"
26 > >
27 > > The only thing that works is manually using "--quiet-build=n" on the
28 > > command line, so it seems the real problem here is "emerge ignoring
29 > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS entries in make.conf".
30 >
31 > Is it that your second setting overrides the first? Try putting all the
32 > settings in one variable assignation.
33 >
34
35 Thanks Neil, that was exactly it.
36 You wouldn't believe some of the serious, major problems I've overcome on
37 my own -- but whenever I do have to ask for help, it seems it's usually for
38 something obvious and stupid.
39
40 Oh well, if I never made mistakes I'd just be harder to live with....
41
42 --
43 caveat utilitor
44 ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤