1 |
On Thu, March 22, 2012 12:55 am, Walter Dnes wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:02:32PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I said this before, but it sounds useful to try to reiterate: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> * It's probable that service-specific files should not be included in |
7 |
>> the init system package. |
8 |
>> * Service-specific init files should probably be part of the |
9 |
>> distro-localized version of a service-providing package. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> This doesn't mean modifying binaries, this is part of bootstrapping a |
12 |
>> service's environment. Call it "deferred installation stages", if you |
13 |
>> like; things which need to be done for the service to be configured |
14 |
>> and properly operate. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> My point is that the startup, sanity-checking, and initialization code |
17 |
> has to go *SOMEWHERE*. Where do you propose moving it to? This |
18 |
> discussion reminds me of an ethnic joke. A bunch of workers had dug out |
19 |
> a hole for the basement and foundations where a new house was to be |
20 |
> built. The workers ask their foreman what they should do with the pile |
21 |
> of dirt they had from digging out the hole for the new house. Their |
22 |
> foreman, who is ____________ tells them to go dig another hole in the |
23 |
> ground and throw the dirt in there. <G> |
24 |
|
25 |
... After pushing the foreman in.... ;) |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Joost |