Archives
Archives
| From: | Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 | ||
| Date: | Wed, 25 May 2011 14:21:36 | ||
| Message-Id: | BANLkTikNSBrUnN9Uo5-jnxrE-tCTeUELGw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 by Indi |
||
| 1 | On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > For people already running kde it's ok, but for the rest of us |
| 3 | > it's a bit ridiculous, isn't it? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | If he was already using Qt4, it might not have seemed so bad. ;) I |
| 6 | think much of that list are from Qt4 and its dependencies. Other than |
| 7 | kdelibs, kde-env, kdepimlibs, oxygen-icons I don't see much generic |
| 8 | KDE stuff (not counting koffice since that's what he was installing). |