1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:01 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Mick did opine |
2 |
thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:51:25 Mick wrote: |
5 |
> > On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
6 |
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did |
7 |
> > > opine |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > thusly: |
10 |
> > > > Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package: |
11 |
> > > > ==================================== |
12 |
> > > > |
13 |
> > > > >>> Emerging (1 of 10) dev-libs/eina-9999 from enlightenment |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > [snip] |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > > ../../src/include/eina_binbuf.h:209: note: previous declaration of |
18 |
> > > > 'eina_binbuf_length_get' was here |
19 |
> > > > eina_amalgamation.c:17936: error: redefinition of |
20 |
> > > > '__STRBUF_MAGIC_STR' eina_amalgamation.c:1222: note: previous |
21 |
> > > > definition of |
22 |
> > > > '__STRBUF_MAGIC_STR' was here |
23 |
> > > |
24 |
> > > FYI, this is fixed in svn now |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I wonder if I can start using the 1.0.0 versions of enlightenment packages |
27 |
> yet, or am I supposed to continue using everything from svn and not mix |
28 |
> them? |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
I tried pegging my system at the 1.0.0 libs that are available, that didn't |
32 |
work too well. |
33 |
|
34 |
The wm (e17 itself) is not released yet so unless you keep it at a snapshot |
35 |
made at the time of the 1.0.0 release you quickly encounter build failures. |
36 |
Same with the various apps in svn and all the third-party modules. |
37 |
|
38 |
Seems like the releases were meant to be a (mostly) feature-complete snapshot |
39 |
that devs could use to test and evaluate and write apps for. Real world |
40 |
dictates that if you like to stay current you should either limit yourself to |
41 |
only those things released already, or keep everything at -9999 |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |