From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone Else "Ping-Ponging" with fltk? | ||
Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:06:30 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120328170138.15540d2a@hactar.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone Else "Ping-Ponging" with fltk? by Todd Goodman |
1 | On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:39:55 -0400, Todd Goodman wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > And more specifically, if the two versions of fltk are slotted it makes |
4 | > me even more surprised that portage wants to depclean the 1.3.0 version. |
5 | |
6 | It can't depclean the other version, because that slot is specifically |
7 | depended on. |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Neil Bothwick |
12 | |
13 | Rainbows are just to look at, not to really understand. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |