| 1 |
On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 23:31:36 -0800, Peter Gordon |
| 2 |
<admin@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Collins Richey wrote: |
| 7 |
> | For the normal non-root user case, this would be '/sbin/pidof X', |
| 8 |
> | unless you have monkeyed with the standard $PATH setup. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> What do you mean? I have done nothing with my $PATH and let Portage handle it as |
| 11 |
> needed. On my system, /usr/bin/pidof is a symlink to /bin/pidof |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> /home/peter $ ls -al `which pidof` |
| 14 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Apr 9 2004 /usr/bin/pidof -> /bin/pidof |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Sorry for the confusion. I was running from a Fedora Core 3 system to |
| 18 |
check out what many local users here are experiencing (nothing |
| 19 |
expecially good, except that xscreensaver runs ok, whereas it fails on |
| 20 |
my gentoo system). Apparently Red Hat (and some other systems) have |
| 21 |
/sbin/pidof. 'which pidof' from a normal user finds nothing. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Collins |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives