1 |
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:32:30 -0400 |
2 |
Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 2012-03-21 12:09 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:56:37 -0400 Tanstaafl wrote: |
6 |
> >> When I tried updating dovecot, it *successfully* emerged the |
7 |
> >> clucene update first (it was already installed), then the dovecot |
8 |
> >> build failed with the error... |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > It's quite simple as it turns out. dev-cpp/clucene changed the name |
11 |
> > of |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > /usr/include/CLucene/clucene-config.h |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > to |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > /usr/include/CLucene/CLConfig.h |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > As a quick nasty test I made a symlink, but that produced a gigantic |
20 |
> > amount of build errors later on. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > I reckon you should file a bug and meanwhile downgrade&mask clucene |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Done: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409205 |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Thanks! But I reckon if I'd have looked more closely, I could have |
27 |
> figured that one out for myself - guess I'm just too used to *not* |
28 |
> being able to figure these out myself... ;) |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
No worries :-) |
32 |
|
33 |
But lets be honest, when you are faced with a zillion lines of gcc |
34 |
output and an error buried in there somewhere, it's not exactly a walk |
35 |
in the park to see what is going wrong. |
36 |
|
37 |
Today I just got lucky and just happened to see the right thing at the |
38 |
right time. |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Alan McKinnnon |
43 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |