From: | "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <vgivanovic@×××××××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast | ||
Date: | Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:24:20 | ||
Message-Id: | 48875B2F.8050609@comcast.net | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast by Andrew Gaydenko |
1 | http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2008/06/portage-22-preserve-libs-features.html |
2 | |
3 | and |
4 | |
5 | http://blog.flameeyes.eu/articles/2008/06/30/a-few-risks-i-see-related-to-the-new-portage-2-2-preserve-libs-behaviour |
6 | http://blog.flameeyes.eu/articles/2008/07/22/the-odyssey-of-preserved-libs-feature |
7 | |
8 | Google (for now) is your friend. |
9 | |
10 | --- Vladimir |
11 | |
12 | on 07/23/2008 09:04 AM Andrew Gaydenko said the following: |
13 | > ======= On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: ======= |
14 | >> on 07/19/2008 02:28 AM Volker Armin Hemmann said the following: |
15 | >>> On Samstag, 19. Juli 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
16 | >>>> Hi all, |
17 | >>>> |
18 | >>>> revdep-rebuild now runs amazingly fast on my machine - 18 seconds as |
19 | >>>> opposed to the 5 minutes or so it used to take ! |
20 | >>>> |
21 | >>>> I see gentoolkit was updated recently. Is this expected behaviour? |
22 | >>> or you are a victim of that new preserved-libs stuff in portage .... |
23 | > |
24 | > Is there somewhere some information about this "preserved-libs"? Wiki has |
25 | > not found anything. |
26 | > |
27 | > |
28 | >> s/victim/beneficiary/ |
29 | >> |
30 | >> "That preserved-lib stuff" has worked just fine for me. It's useful to |
31 | >> know what needs to be rebuilt, then to be able to rebuild just those |
32 | >> packages. |
33 | >> |
34 | >> --- Vladimir |
35 | > |
36 | > |
37 | |
38 | -- |
39 | Vladimir G. Ivanovic |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild now very very fast | Justin <justin@×××××××××.net> |