From: | App Deb <appdebgr@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk activity? | ||
Date: | Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:21:22 | ||
Message-Id: | AANLkTikg8bFDu9KPN7xBoYXU9-MT0MP+C1+w5DwFfHPP@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk activity? by Nikos Chantziaras |
1 | On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
2 | > On 11/28/2010 01:03 AM, Stroller wrote: |
3 | >> |
4 | >> On 27/11/2010, at 10:22pm, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
5 | >>> |
6 | >>> The ck patch set does not support group scheduling anyway; |
7 | >> |
8 | >> Now I'm a little more confused. Does `ionice` need the CFQ scheduler? |
9 | > |
10 | > Nope. I/O scheduling priorities are part of the I/O scheduler, not the CPU |
11 | > scheduler. |
12 | |
13 | CFQ is the official I/O scheduler. |
14 | |
15 | ionice only works with CFQ. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-user] Re: Best way to improve interactivity with heavy disk activity? | walt <w41ter@×××××.com> |