<p><br>
On Mar 28, 2012 1:17 PM, "Pandu Poluan" <<a href="mailto:pandu@...">pandu@...</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Mar 28, 2012 11:27 AM, "Mike Edenfield" <<a href="mailto:kutulu@...">kutulu@...</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Well, for one, the initramfs solution is not generally considered "ugly"<br>
> > except by a select vocal few who object to it on vague, unarticulated<br>
> > grounds.<br>
><br>
> Check out the email from William Kenworth in this mailing list; he's having trouble with initramfs being a blackbox.<br>
><br>
> As a (mostly) server guy, I much prefer using a whitebox.<br>
><br>
> I happen to have /usr on a VHD, so I don't need an initramfs for booting (that, plus my production servers are all udev-less). If push comes to shove, what I'll do is create a vestigial /usr in the root partition, and have it overlaid by mounting the actual root over it. </p>
<p>That should be: "mounting the actual /usr over it."</p>
<p>Rgds,<br>
</p>
|
