Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-user
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-user: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-user@g.o
From: Dale <rdalek1967@...>
Subject: Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 19:19:51 -0500
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@...> wrote:

>>
>> Here is my grub lines:
>>
>> title=Initramfs-new_kernel
>> root (hd0,0)
>> kernel /boot/bzImage-3.2.11-1 root=/dev/sda3 init=/sbin/init  rd.debug
>> rd.udev.debug
>> initrd /initramfs-3.2.11.img
>>
>> title Gentoo
>> kernel (hd0,0)/bzImage-3.2.11-1 root=/dev/sda3
>> acpi_enforce_resources=lax raid=noautodetect iommu=noaperture
>>
>> The stuff on the end without the init thingy was added to make sure
>> gkrellm worked.  I think it is fixed now and can be removed but I just
>> haven't done it yet.
>>
>> I added that debug stuff to the line for the init thngy but have not
>> booted it yet.
> 
> Why do you have /boot/bzImage-3.2.11-1 in the initramfs kernel, but
> (hd0,0)/bzImage-3.2.11-1 in the other one? You have /boot in another
> partition, so in both cases you should have something similar to
> 
> root (hd0,0)
> kernel (hd0,1)/bzImage-3.2.11-1 ...
> 
> isn't? (where "(hd0,1)" is your /boot partition, since you do use
> labels, I don't know the exact number).
> 
> Could it be possible that you are booting with an older kernel when
> using the initramfs entry without noticing it? Can you "umount /boot"
> in your machine and see if there is a kernel in there, and if it's
> different from the one in the actual /boot partition?
> 
> In any case, the two grub entries are certainly not "identical"
> besides the initrd line (maybe they should be?). Also, can a have a
> look at your /usr/src/linux/.config file?
> 
> Regards.


I unmounted /boot and there was nothing there.  I'll remove that extra
/boot but I doubt it will matter.  After all, it just symlinks to
itself.  At least mine does here anyway.  ;-)

As to the kernel, it boots the exact same kernel.  That is the only
kernel I have for that version.  If grub was pointing to anything else,
it wouldn't be there to even try to boot.

What should I add to fstab for /dev?  This is a desktopy rig.

Thanks.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"


References:
Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan Mackenzie
Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- che
RE: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Mike Edenfield
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan Mackenzie
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan McKinnon
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan Mackenzie
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan McKinnon
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan Mackenzie
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Neil Bothwick
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan Mackenzie
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Dale
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Canek Peláez Valdés
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Dale
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Canek Peláez Valdés
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Dale
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Canek Peláez Valdés
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Dale
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Canek Peláez Valdés
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Dale
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Canek Peláez Valdés
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Dale
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Canek Peláez Valdés
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-user: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Advice about ati-drivers? [50% SOLVED]
Next by date:
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?


Updated May 04, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-user mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.