1 |
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 01:42:18PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> OK - it turns out if I start fdisk using the -u option it show me |
3 |
> sector numbers. Looking at the original partition put on just using |
4 |
> default values it had the starting sector was 63 - probably about the |
5 |
> worst value it could be. As a test I blew away that partition and |
6 |
> created a new one starting at 64 instead and the untar results are |
7 |
> vastly improved - down to roughly 20 seconds from 8-10 minutes. That's |
8 |
> roughly twice as fast as the old 120GB SATA2 drive I was using to test |
9 |
> the system out while I debugged this issue. |
10 |
|
11 |
That's good to hear. |
12 |
|
13 |
> I'm still a little fuzzy about what happens to the extra sectors at |
14 |
> the end of a track. Are they used and I pay for a little bit of |
15 |
> overhead reading data off of them or are they ignored and I lose |
16 |
> capacity? I think it must be the former as my partition isn't all that |
17 |
> much less than 1TB. |
18 |
|
19 |
As far as I know, you shouldn't worry about it. The |
20 |
head/track/cylinder addressing is a relic of an older day. Almost all |
21 |
modern drives should be accessed via LBA. If interested, take a look |
22 |
at the wikipedia entry on Cylinder-Head-Sector and Logical Block |
23 |
Addressing. |
24 |
|
25 |
Basically, you are not losing anything. |
26 |
|
27 |
Cheers, |
28 |
|
29 |
W |
30 |
-- |
31 |
Willie W. Wong wwong@××××××××××××××.edu |
32 |
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire |
33 |
et vice versa ~~~ I. Newton |