Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-user
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-user: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-user@g.o
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@...>
Subject: Re: Cleaning redundant configuration files
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:46:36 +0200
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:48 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Peter 
Humphrey did opine thusly:

> > It's quite simple logic... If a file is modified, it is no longer the
> > file portage installed, so portage does not uninstall it. If anything,
> > the problem is that the logic used by portage is too simple.
> 
> I don't think it's too simple. It seems exactly right for the task to me: 
> clear, predictable and easily understood.

And completely consistent with the philosophy of Gentoo, where the user is in 
complete control and must make the hard decisions.

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com


References:
Re: Cleaning redundant configuration files
-- Neil Bothwick
Re: Cleaning redundant configuration files
-- Peter Humphrey
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-user: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Cleaning redundant configuration files
Next by thread:
Re: Cleaning redundant configuration files
Previous by date:
Re: Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?
Next by date:
Re: Cleaning redundant configuration files


Updated May 04, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-user mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.