Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-user
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-user: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-user@g.o
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@...>
Subject: Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:35:44 +0000
Hi, Alan.

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:48:19PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:24:22 +0000
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@...> wrote:

> > That is precisely what the question was NOT about.  The idea was to
> > copy (not move) booting software to /sbin instead of an initramfs -
> > the exact same programs, modulo noise - to have the SW in /sbin
> > necessary to mount /usr.

> Two words:

> shared libraries

> Copying binaries is not enough. You have to find and copy every shared
> library those binaries use. Plus all the data and other files they
> might need.

> This is non-trivial.

<silently screams>.  It's equally non-trivial for initramfs, yet nobody
seems to be raising this objection for that.

Why is nobody else on this thread willing to take up its main point, the
exact equivalence between the known, ugly, initramfs solution and the as
yet half-baked idea of putting the same binaries into /sbin?

> -- 
> Alan McKinnnon
> alan.mckinnon@...

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


Replies:
RE: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Mike Edenfield
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan McKinnon
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Neil Bothwick
References:
After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan Mackenzie
RE: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Mike Edenfield
Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan Mackenzie
Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Neil Bothwick
Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- che
RE: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Mike Edenfield
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan Mackenzie
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
-- Alan McKinnon
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-user: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?
Previous by date:
Re: InitRAMFS - boot expert sought
Next by date:
Re: Re: After /usr conflation: why not copy booting software to /sbin rather than initramfs?


Updated May 04, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-user mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.