Gentoo Archives: gentoo-vdr

From: Joerg Bornkessel <hd_brummy@g.o>
To: Martin Dummer <gentoo-vdr@l.g.o>, gentoo-vdr@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-vdr] proposed ebuild: vdr-dvbhddevice pulled directly from source tree
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:10:00
Message-Id: 1604866857.20120302172159@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-vdr] proposed ebuild: vdr-dvbhddevice pulled directly from source tree by Martin Dummer
1 Hallo Martin Dummer,
2
3 you wrote on Freitag, 2. März 2012 / 00:31:
4
5
6 sounds good,
7 fixed some technical issues.
8
9 Use latestet eapi, -> EAPI=4
10
11 removed comments about the patch,
12 this info should be added in the top of the patch
13 also the source where is the patch from.
14
15 removed use-flag firmware
16 note: DEPEND= packages, need on compile time
17 RDEPEND= packages, need on runtime
18 this is what the created libs will call
19
20 the use-flag firmware is more a candidat for the comming up
21 tt-s2-6400-modules-${PV}.ebuild
22 (not shure yet about the name convention)
23 then it should not called as use-flag,
24 better is an info call in
25
26 pkg_postinst() { }
27
28 then.
29
30 Iam not shure about the name of use-flag vdr-sc-patch
31 should it not be, transfermode?
32 please attache the patch in your reply, then we will see more...
33
34 anyway, dont know yet what the patch will fix,
35 and is the patch on all >=vdr-1.7.18 or
36 all vdr-sc versions needed,
37
38 --
39 Visit us on IRC: Freenode #gentoo-vdr
40
41 Gentoo Developer
42 mailto: hd_brummy@g.o

Attachments

File name MIME type
vdr-dvbhddevice-0.0.4_p20120207.ebuild_v2 application/octet-stream