1 |
Hi Renat, |
2 |
|
3 |
> 1) Show-stoppers: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124440: webapp.eclass calls emerge |
6 |
> Suggested solution (webapp-cleaner) posted to the bug. I plan to add it |
7 |
> to the tree in about a week unless there are objections. |
8 |
|
9 |
Great, thanks for the fix. |
10 |
|
11 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136959: webapps gets uninstalled on |
12 |
> reinstall w/ USE="vhost" |
13 |
> Suggested solution (eclass fixes) posted to |
14 |
> http://www.vhost-tools.org/ticket/32 . I would like to fix this ASAP |
15 |
> without waiting for w-c-1.60. Stuart and wrobel, please review and post |
16 |
> comments. |
17 |
|
18 |
I am pretty certain that I can review it this week. I only gave it a |
19 |
short glance so far but this needs a closer look. |
20 |
|
21 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130371: webapp-config not installing |
22 |
> files with correct permissions |
23 |
> w-c removes +x on files copied to vhost, which breaks CGI apps. This |
24 |
> needs to be fixed in w-c. wrobel: any thoughts on the timeline? |
25 |
|
26 |
I'll add that to my urgent todo-list and should be able to get it done |
27 |
in the next two weeks. |
28 |
|
29 |
> 2) Needed functionality: |
30 |
> |
31 |
> http://www.vhost-tools.org/ticket/6: allow webapp-config to install multiple |
32 |
> apps in the same directory |
33 |
> Needed for plugins etc |
34 |
|
35 |
Would not really like to do that for the current w-c version. But I |
36 |
admit that I did not try to determine how much time it would take to |
37 |
implement it in the current version. |
38 |
|
39 |
> 3) Needs closure: |
40 |
> |
41 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124443: webapp.eclass: SLOT mishandling |
42 |
> I'm planning to remove the warning from the eclass tomorrow. Since |
43 |
> Halcy0n retired, we should check with QA again whether PVR is |
44 |
> acceptable. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> IMO, the rest can wait. Stuart and wrobel: I would very much appreciate your |
47 |
> comments on the above bugs and proposed solutions. Also, wrobel, it'd be great |
48 |
> to get your thoughts on the timeline for w-c-1.60. |
49 |
|
50 |
Thanks for the effort. I know that I need some pushing concerning w-c |
51 |
at the moment. It is hard to determine the timeline on w-c-1.60. The |
52 |
majority of the basic structure is there and the stuff I have been |
53 |
doing in the last weeks was adding small bits and pieces of |
54 |
functionality back in. I added a short PLANNING.txt file but that does |
55 |
not contain too much information yet. I'd definitely like to get the |
56 |
configuration structure completed before I finish this document. At |
57 |
that point the class structure should be clear enough to continue |
58 |
together on the newer version. I hesitate to make promises on the |
59 |
timeline since that often turns out to be too optimistic. I'd |
60 |
definitely suggest we continue to use the 1.50.* line for a while and |
61 |
kill the most important bugs there. |
62 |
|
63 |
I'm definitely not going to give up on the w-c-1.60 version because I |
64 |
feel we need a better structure in order to be able to efficiently |
65 |
maintain the code. I do see the benefit of that in layman and would |
66 |
like to have a similar situation with w-c. |
67 |
|
68 |
Cheers |
69 |
|
70 |
Gunnar |
71 |
|
72 |
-- |
73 |
Gunnar Wrobel Gentoo Developer |
74 |
__________________C_o_n_t_a_c_t__________________ |
75 |
|
76 |
Mail: wrobel@g.o |
77 |
WWW: http://www.gunnarwrobel.de |
78 |
IRC: #gentoo-web at freenode.org |
79 |
_________________________________________________ |
80 |
-- |
81 |
gentoo-web-user@g.o mailing list |