Gentoo Archives: gnap-dev

From: Philipp Riegger <lists@××××××××××××.de>
To: gnap-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gnap-dev] State of the union
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 12:47:58
Message-Id: 1211719664.23566.7.camel@troy.riegger.name
Hi everybody!

We just created gnap-dev on Google Code:
http://code.google.com/p/gnap-dev/
So please drop us (Andrey or me) a line and we will add you to the
project.

Furthermore we added gnap-dev as email address where all svn commits
will be sent. This is ok, i guess, because this is a development list.
And it is too much overhead to create an extra list for that. I filed a
bug to get these messages whitelisted:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223551

Next thing: I'd like to reorganize the repository and the ebuilds. I
would like to split it the other way around than they are at the moment.
I'd like to have:

A) One ebuild called gnap, that installes all gnap_* scripts,
documentation and examples.

B) ebuilds of the form gnap-x86-uclibc, gnap-x86-glibc,
gnap-x86-uclibc-hardened,... for each target we support containing a
seedstage, build gnap base fs, maybe prebuilt extensions and the portage
snapshot. We could controll the installation of prebuild extensions,
prebuilt base fs and maybe other stuff with USE-flags. We could also
split the portage snapshot into an extra ebuild in case multiple targets
share the same one.

A should have regular version numbers, like 2.0, 2.1, whatever, B should
only have dates as version.

Comments?

Thanks,
	Philipp



-- 
gnap-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gnap-dev] State of the union "josé Alberto Suárez López" <bass@g.o>