Gentoo Archives: gnap-dev

From: Philipp Riegger <lists@××××××××××××.de>
To: gnap-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gnap-dev] [PATCH 0/4] GNAP improvements, probably for 2.1
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:08:37
Message-Id: 1186149463.10651.56.camel@b136a
In Reply to: [gnap-dev] [PATCH 0/4] GNAP improvements, probably for 2.1 by Philipp Riegger
1 On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 16:16 +0300, Philipp Riegger wrote:
2 > Things that still need to be done:
3 > - Make the portage tarball creation code of gnap_make nicer. Since
4 > catalyst supports overlays, this is probably the way to go: Use the
5 > unmodified potage snapshot and merge all given overlays into one
6 > overlay
7 > and give it to catalyst. Maybe catalyst can even handle more than one
8 > overlay, but i do not know since i did not have a look at this.
9 > - Lots of code is still duplicated in there and could be put to
10 > functions. I espcially mean gnap_make and the stage-specific code.
11 > - This patchset works on the scripts, mostly n gnap_make and only
12 > does
13 > minimal changes to the provided config files. Maybe the gnap-devver
14 > convigfiles have to be changed accordingly, someone should have a look
15 > at the patches and theese files.
16
17 - I was planign to have a look at a test set for gnap_make this would
18 do the following:
19 - Create a test for every error patch (gtest $?, gdie) to look i they
20 are triggered corrrectly and if the output is right.
21 - Create a test case that builds every possible stage with an empty
22 storedir (possibly 1 test per stage).
23 - Weekly builds with the gnap tree/a tree snapshot from upstream.
24
25 Philipp
26
27 --
28 gnap-dev@g.o mailing list