| 1 |
Curtis Napier wrote: |
| 2 |
> Xavier Neys wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Links to GWN RSS feeds are not properly displayed: |
| 5 |
>> http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/gwn.xml |
| 6 |
>> http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/gwn.xml |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I forgot to copy over the image. fixed. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The xml image is underlined and it's darn ugly IMHO. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>> > ... and an email to the docs-team icon added. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Very bad idea, at least the address is. |
| 15 |
>> docs-team is an alias that should only be used by bugzilla to notify |
| 16 |
>> GDP members. GDP is not going to maintain the site itself, GDP |
| 17 |
>> definitely does not want to be mailed about any issues outside of /doc/* |
| 18 |
>> Use an appropriate address or none at all. |
| 19 |
>> FYI, some of us probably move mails to docs-team that do not come from |
| 20 |
>> bugzilla straight to /dev/null. At least I do :) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> That should have been gentoo-doc@g.o. fixed. Is this good or |
| 24 |
> should I use a different address? This only shows up on pages that use |
| 25 |
> /guide or /book. I can always just remove it if you don't want it or if |
| 26 |
> we can't come up with an acceptable address. The www@g.o is in |
| 27 |
> the footer of every page as well. Thoughts? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
gentoo-doc@g.o was even worse, good to see it's been removed. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
>> > ramereth, swift and klieber: what do you think? I would like to have |
| 32 |
>> > this site up and running before christmas, is that feasible? |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> Doing important changes when some (many?) guys are less available or |
| 35 |
>> away for holidays might not be a very good idea. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Normally I would agree with you but I've been doing this for so long now |
| 39 |
> I'm really itching to get it up and move on to the other sites. I know I |
| 40 |
> know, it shouldn't matter what I'm "itching" to do and only the quality |
| 41 |
> of the work should be considered. If all of us involved don't think we |
| 42 |
> can get this up by the New Year then so be it but I really want to try. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Good to see we agree on it being released when it's ready and all known |
| 45 |
glitches have been solved. |
| 46 |
Besides, you should make sure the right people will be available to handle the |
| 47 |
feedback & bugs that will probably come, and that includes you. |
| 48 |
Bugs like |
| 49 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/114897 (link to /doc/en/list.xml on front page) or |
| 50 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/113796 (Truncated code samples) |
| 51 |
or anything that has to do with html/css will end up on your lap. |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Wkr, |
| 55 |
-- |
| 56 |
/ Xavier Neys |
| 57 |
\_ Gentoo Documentation Project |
| 58 |
/ French & Internationalisation Lead |
| 59 |
\ http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en |
| 60 |
/\ |
| 61 |
-- |
| 62 |
www-redesign@g.o mailing list |
Archives