List Archive: www-redesign
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Curtis Napier wrote:
> While I'm waiting for Aaron to create a new logo I am taking the time to
> upgrade the site to xhtml-1.1. I put this in a blog post yesterday and
> already have received numerous reports that I am doing it incorrectly.
> I want everyone on the list to feel confident in this change:
> The specification for xhtml-1.1 says that the server *should* send
> application/xml+xhtml in the HTTP header but that it *can* send
> text/html in order to remain backwards compatible with older user
> agents, IE for example. As long as the doctype is set correctly (and it
> is) it is still valid xhtml-1.1.
It also says "should not" in black on red.
You've explained at greath lengths why you think it is acceptable to send
text/html as content-type, but not why a user agent that accepts
application/xhtml+xml and is sent application/xhtml+xml is not told the
content is application/xhtml+xml
It's a minor issue with browsers, but I guess we'll get bugs or a questions
about that regularly.
Anyway, you should stick to xhtml1, preferably strict, because libxml2 does
not support 1.1.
Old stuff, but still valid.
If you stick to the XHTML 1.0 doctype, you'll notice magic stuff happening to
your transforms such as the name space being added to <html>, or xml:lang="pl"
automatically added if you only have lang="pl"...
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0"
extension-element-prefixes="exslt func str" >
doctype-public="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
/ Xavier Neys
\_ Gentoo Documentation Project
/ French & Internationalisation Lead
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list