From: Santiago Ferreira <santiago.ferreira@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>, Anna <cyber+gentoo@sysrq.in>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Encourage donations to Gentoo developers
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 13:10:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHdwBF5_cvnGJgTGCtu8F7ESLK9vq86BDvmAsPnSvLw0DRf9Mg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAr7Pr_f=G-stHRHisRrMV8d65NHLcE-iTc_3cfOB6bogug5TQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5361 bytes --]
Hello community, I'm not the most active person, I read the email list and
the forum, please keep them, last year at MozFest I found
https://webmonetization.org/ , that's the most open way that I believe that
could be good to developers, could be something to talk this year at
MozFest https://www.mozillafestival.org/en/ let's think in different ways
to promote Gentoo
Santiago
El jue., 16 de febrero de 2023 4:45 p. m., Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
escribió:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 3:02 PM Maciej Barć <xgqt@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rich!
> >
> > Thanks a lot for reminding the reason why the GF "payments" are a bad
> idea.
> >
> > Do you know what is GF's stance on funding "local" dev HW? I think
> > people inside toolchain/chromium/firefox or other projects requiring a
> > lot of computation power to run various compilation/test configurations
> > could use HW provided/sponsored by the Foundation.
>
> Again, for transparency, I am President of the Gentoo Foundation.
>
> I think we have traditionally two options here:
> - One is we buy hardware, it's owned by Gentoo (Foundation) and we
> operate it as our asset. We typically do not deploy assets to people's
> homes because there is risk (of that person going away) and because
> the benefit of 'local' hardware are experienced by one person (the
> person in that locality). So value-wise having a 'local' asset is very
> similar to having a hosted asset.
> - The second is we buy hardware and basically give it to someone.
> This has a few other problems:
> - Accounting paperwork for having that person as a vendor; the
> developer should likely be treating that machine as income; paying
> taxes on it, etc.
> - Ethical considerations on allocation of Foundation resources
> (fairness, basically.)
>
> We have traditionally offered hosted resources, which we have done in
> the past and continue to endeavour to do.
> We also have the nitrokey program, where we purchase assets and ship
> them directly to developers:
> - This is an equal access program, everyone is eligible for 1
> Foundation provided Nitrokey and we ensure we have enough funds to
> cover the entire cost of that program.
> - Accounting and logistics-wise, the items are so small and so costly
> to run logistics for, we just choose not to do it (so developers who
> leave do not ship their keys back to us.)
> - It's probable that technically the developers who leave Gentoo
> should record the value of the nitrokey as income, but in most
> jurisdictions the cost is so small it doesn't matter anyway.
>
> I don't believe we have enough money to buy everyone a local
> development rig, and I'm not really sure that program really adds
> significant value over a hosted solution, so I'd likely frame any
> local development around that value-delivery conversation.
>
> -A
>
> >
> > On 2/15/23 23:50, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 5:36 PM Maciej Barć <xgqt@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I've also heard that GF will never touch this because it is against
> the
> > >> foundation's laws, "because Gentoo cannot pay itself"... shrug.
> > >
> > > No such legal/formal restriction exists (the bylaws even have some
> > > provisions for employees (we don't have any)), but there are many
> > > reasons that this can get messy.
> > >
> > > I personally think it would make way more sense to just make it easy
> > > for developers to list some kind of info about how to donate to them,
> > > and just leave it all up to individuals.
> > >
> > > Offhand some issues with Gentoo handing out "salaries" or anything
> > > close to it are:
> > >
> > > 1. There will be endless debates over who gets how much. Some
> > > obviously do more than others, and so you either pay everybody the
> > > same and hear grumbling about inactive devs, or pay people based on
> > > activity and then have grumbling or manipulation of the metrics.
> > > 2. Gentoo just doesn't bring in that much money in the first place, so
> > > it would be a lot of arguing over what probably will end up being $50
> > > here and $100 there.
> > > 3. Now you have a ton of tax overhead, potentially in many
> > > jurisdictions. Reimbursing expenses at least in the US isn't taxed,
> > > but when you start paying people for contributions you have a bunch of
> > > legal issues.
> > > 4. Then you just have the general volunteer culture. Gentoo currently
> > > is an all-volunteer organization, and as such has a certain culture.
> > > If you look at FOSS organizations that tend to pay substantial amounts
> > > of people you end up with professional management and so on. That
> > > isn't necessarily a bad thing but it is a big change.
> > >
> > > It just is an issue that I don't think anybody wants to go near. If
> > > people want to donate to their favorite dev I doubt anybody would be
> > > bothered. It just doesn't make sense to have the foundation operate
> > > as a payment processor when you have lots of companies that offer
> > > exactly that service, or things like cryptocurrency if you want to go
> > > that route.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Have a great day!
> >
> > ~ Maciej XGQT Barć
> >
> > xgqt@gentoo.org
> > Gentoo Linux developer
> > (emacs, math, ml, scheme, sci)
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6829 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-18 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 19:06 [gentoo-project] Encourage donations to Gentoo developers Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova
2023-02-15 22:36 ` Maciej Barć
2023-02-15 22:44 ` Maciej Barć
2023-02-15 22:50 ` Rich Freeman
2023-02-15 23:02 ` Maciej Barć
2023-02-15 23:20 ` Rich Freeman
2023-02-16 19:45 ` Alec Warner
2023-02-18 16:10 ` Santiago Ferreira [this message]
2023-02-16 17:59 ` Alec Warner
2023-02-16 18:06 ` Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova
2023-02-16 18:18 ` Alec Warner
2023-02-16 18:08 ` Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHdwBF5_cvnGJgTGCtu8F7ESLK9vq86BDvmAsPnSvLw0DRf9Mg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=santiago.ferreira@gmail.com \
--cc=cyber+gentoo@sysrq.in \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=rich0@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox