Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alpha

From: Marc Giger <gigerstyle@×××.ch>
To: Jay Maynard <jmaynard@××××××××.cx>, jwsacksteder@××××××××××××.com
Cc: gentoo-alpha@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:07:26
Message-Id: 20040225200718.03799597.gigerstyle@gmx.ch
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alpha] vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources by Jay Maynard
1 On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:30:49 -0600
2 Jay Maynard <jmaynard@××××××××.cx> wrote:
3
4 > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:25:15PM -0500,
5 > jwsacksteder@××××××××××××.com wrote:
6 > > Considering the recent security issues, I want to move up to 2.4.25.
7 > > It looks like I'm stuck with vanilla-sources unless someone is
8 > > planning on updating alpha-sources soon.
9
10 alpha-sources-2.4.21-r4 should contain all security patches!
11
12 If you don't use ipv6, ipsec etc. you should be fine with
13 vanilla-sources.
14
15 >
16 > I'm currently working on building a new LiveCD, but once that's done,
17 > I'd be willing to look at this one.
18 >
19 > Just what was done to vanilla-sources to get to alpha-sources?
20
21 A lot! Some month ago I made a new ebuild for 2.4.23 (search archive),
22 but it was never picked up and integrated to portage:-(
23
24 I'm willing to do the same for 2.4.25 but I'm still waiting for some
25 updated patches (e.g acl, superfreeswan, USAGI etc).
26
27 greets
28
29 Marc
30
31 --
32 gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alpha] vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>