| 1 |
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:09:23 +0000 |
| 2 |
Tavis Ormandy <taviso@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> They really do generate better performing code than gcc, and most |
| 5 |
> packages can be built successfully. I wouldnt reccomend switching from |
| 6 |
> gcc to ccc for shared libraries (like zlib, openssl, etc) at the |
| 7 |
> moment, but most other things should work just great, and give a |
| 8 |
> noticable performance improvement (apache, python, bash, perl, etc). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Have you tried to compile apache-2.0.48 with ccc? Does it work? If yes, |
| 11 |
how did you manage it? |
| 12 |
On a lot of packages (apache too) i get something like the following: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
cc: Error: apr_snprintf.c, line 439: In this statement, "__LONG_MAX__" |
| 15 |
is not declared. (undeclared) if ((num <= ULONG_MAX && is_unsigned) |
| 16 |
|| (num <= LONG_MAX && !is_unsigned))----------------^ |
| 17 |
cc: Error: apr_snprintf.c, line 695: In this statement, "__LONG_MAX__" |
| 18 |
is not declared. (undeclared) if (num <= ULONG_MAX) |
| 19 |
---------------^ |
| 20 |
make[4]: *** [apr_snprintf.lo] Error 1 |
| 21 |
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Comments, suggestions, tips? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Marc |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list |
Archives