Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alpha

From: Davide Cittaro <davide.cittaro@×××××××××××××××.it>
To: gentoo-alpha@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] gcc 4.1.1-r3?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:58:30
Message-Id: 47BBA11C-6FF3-4A2E-A037-287C42C3813A@ifom-ieo-campus.it
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alpha] gcc 4.1.1-r3? by "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)"
Hi

On May 14, 2007, at 11:42 AM, José Luis Rivero (yoswink) wrote:

> Hello Davide: > > Davide Cittaro escribió: >> Hi all, I'm trying to upgrade to alpha profile for gentoo 2007. >> Since gcc 4.1.1 has been considered stable, it is included in my >> system emerge process. BTW I cannot compile it. Before posting the >> bug report on bugs.gentoo.org, I would like to know if somebody >> here has gcc 4.1.1 working on gentoo alpha > > In Gentoo/Alpha gcc is usually well tested before it goes to stable > (due to the nature of our distribution). So yes, some of us have > gcc 4.1.1 working on alpha. > > Anyway, it's quite difficult to check every combination present in > each system, so probably something in your system is triggering the > error. Best thing to do is file a bug and attach there your emerge > --info and the error. >
done. it's bug 178482 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178482 in the meantime, do you have any hint? It is a DS25 (ev68 processor). I've tried to change -march flag from ev67 to ev6, I've tried to remove -j3 make option... no way! I'm in the middle of a general upgrading, so it would be great to have a system working in a few time. Do you think I can go on in emerging system? I still miss these packages: # emerge -Dup system These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating system dependencies... done! [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1-r3 USE="fortran nls (-altivec) - bootstrap -build -doc -gcj -gtk (-hardened) -ip28 -ip32r10k -mudflap (-multilib) -multislot (-n32) (-n64) -nocxx -objc -objc++ -objc-gc - test -vanilla" [ebuild U ] sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.39 [1.38-r1] [ebuild N ] sys-apps/acl-2.2.39-r1 USE="nls -nfs" [ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r2 [2.3.5-r3] USE="nptl* nptlonly* -debug%" [ebuild U ] net-misc/rsync-2.6.9-r1 [2.6.8-r2] USE="acl*" [ebuild U ] sys-apps/util-linux-2.12r-r5 [2.12r-r3] [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r2 [3.4.6-r1] USE="-d% -gtk* -test%" [ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-104-r12 [070-r1] [ebuild U ] sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.2.2-r3 [3.2.1] USE="-no- old-linux%" [ebuild U ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r5 [0.78-r3] [ebuild U ] sys-apps/shadow-4.0.18.1 [4.0.15-r2] USE="cracklib%*" [ebuild U ] net-misc/openssh-4.5_p1-r1 [4.3_p2-r5] and a 2.6 kernel (of course). I was afraid that new kernel wouldn't work, but I have a bigger problem if neither gcc compiles... :-( d /* Davide Cittaro HPC and Bioinformatics Systems @ Informatics Core IFOM - Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare via adamello, 16 20139 Milano Italy tel.: +39(02)574303007 e-mail: davide.cittaro@×××××××××××××××.it */