1 |
Thanks, Marc, |
2 |
|
3 |
I guess it's a good thing I didn't build with |
4 |
USE="-nptlonly" then, huh? ;-) |
5 |
|
6 |
Should I file a duplicate bug in bugzilla (if it would |
7 |
help)? |
8 |
|
9 |
So, is there some kind of catch 22 going on here? |
10 |
Weren't there some reports of problems with |
11 |
linuxthreads in glibc on Alpha? |
12 |
|
13 |
Jeff D |
14 |
|
15 |
--- Marc Giger <gigerstyle@×××.ch> wrote: |
16 |
|
17 |
> Hi, |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I reported the same problem to bugzilla... |
20 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100259#c36 |
21 |
> (Perhaps it finds more attention here...) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> It seems it has to do with the current state of ntpl |
24 |
> on |
25 |
> alphas. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> If you set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 and therefore |
28 |
> force |
29 |
> to use linuxthreads, emerge works again. |
30 |
> But I don't know if it really is nptl's fault. I can |
31 |
> manually |
32 |
> compile everything with the same parameters as |
33 |
> portage does. So a portage (sandbox?) fault is also |
34 |
> possible. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Marc |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:45:57 -0800 (PST) |
40 |
> Jeff Donsbach <jeff_donsbach@×××××.com> wrote: |
41 |
> |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > Good point, Nils. Perhaps "5" is the configure.log |
44 |
> I |
45 |
> > included? I don't know.I'll try that tonight (the |
46 |
> > Miata is at home). |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> > Jeff D |
49 |
> > |
50 |
> > --- "Nils o. Janus" <NoJ@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> > > Hi Jeff, |
53 |
> > > |
54 |
> > > > configure:1892: checking whether the C |
55 |
> compiler |
56 |
> > > > (/usr/bin/gcc -mieee -mcpu=ev56 -pipe -O2 ) |
57 |
> works |
58 |
> > > > configure:1908: /usr/bin/gcc -o conftest |
59 |
> -mieee |
60 |
> > > > -mcpu=ev56 -pipe -O2 conftest.c 1>&5 |
61 |
> > > ^^^^ |
62 |
> > > what perplexes me is that stdout is redirecting |
63 |
> to |
64 |
> > > the filedescriptor 5 |
65 |
> > > which is not a standardized one. |
66 |
> > > Does that filedescriptor ( /dev/fd/5 ) exist? |
67 |
> > > This may be the reason why compiling without |
68 |
> > > redirecting the output, like |
69 |
> > > you already tried, works fine. |
70 |
> > > |
71 |
> > > Try passing the 1>&5 to the call of gcc too and |
72 |
> > > check wether it segfaults |
73 |
> > > again. |
74 |
> > > |
75 |
> > > On a DS20e, gcc just throws a "Bad file |
76 |
> descriptor" |
77 |
> > > error without |
78 |
> > > segfaulting. |
79 |
> > > |
80 |
> > > HTH, |
81 |
> > > |
82 |
> > > greetings |
83 |
> > > Nils |
84 |
> > > -- |
85 |
> > > gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list |
86 |
> > > |
87 |
> > > |
88 |
> > |
89 |
> > |
90 |
> > |
91 |
> > |
92 |
> > __________________________________________ |
93 |
> > Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. |
94 |
> > Just $16.99/mo. or less. |
95 |
> > dsl.yahoo.com |
96 |
> > |
97 |
> > -- |
98 |
> > gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list |
99 |
> > |
100 |
> |
101 |
> -- |
102 |
> gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list |
103 |
> |
104 |
> |
105 |
|
106 |
|
107 |
__________________________________________________ |
108 |
Do You Yahoo!? |
109 |
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around |
110 |
http://mail.yahoo.com |
111 |
-- |
112 |
gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list |