| 1 |
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:09:13AM -0500, Aron Griffis wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jay Maynard wrote: [Tue Mar 16 2004, 09:16:58PM EST] |
| 3 |
> > Finally, there's one fix to a multiline literal in an Alpha-specific |
| 4 |
> > assembler header file, referenced in bug 38354. It appears to have been |
| 5 |
> > fixed in 2.6.4. |
| 6 |
> Unfortunately 2.6.4 is broken on alpha due to changes made by the |
| 7 |
> linux-ia64 team (kernel.org, not Gentoo). 2.6.3 works well, though. |
| 8 |
> Hopefully 2.6.5 will be fixed up (but I don't think so yet). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Broken how? I'm running it on a couple of boxes; aside from the fact that |
| 11 |
aboot 0.9 won't compile against 2.6, it's doing just fine. (I built aboot by |
| 12 |
installing 2.4 sources long enough to compile against.) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > Do we have a feel for how many folks out there are using the full |
| 15 |
> > grsecurity, or the complete SuperFreeS/WAN, or USAGI? Is it something we |
| 16 |
> > should push to have included in the Gentoo kernel by default? |
| 17 |
> Doesn't matter to me. Personally I'd like to see Gentoo/Alpha move to |
| 18 |
> 2.6.x for 2004.1, but I suppose that would be pushing too quickly. |
| 19 |
> Maybe it would be possible for 2004.2. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Well, if we can get aboot fixed, and identify and fix the breakage you |
| 22 |
mention, then we can get there easily. 2.6 is the specified kernel for |
| 23 |
2004.1... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list |
Archives