Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alpha

From: Marc Giger <gigerstyle@×××.ch>
To: gentoo-alpha@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] grsec patch for 2.4.23 with XFS
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:40:46
Message-Id: 20031210234043.4498252d.gigerstyle@gmx.ch
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alpha] grsec patch for 2.4.23 with XFS by Aron Griffis
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:33:58 -0500
Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o> wrote:

> Marc Giger wrote: [Wed Dec 10 2003, 03:23:23PM EST] > > I hope you mean 2.4.21-r1? Never seen a -r2 ebuild > > Right, that's because I forgot to commit it... 6 days ago. It's just > a rev-bump to push out the do_brk fix. I've committed it now.
Sorry, why to push out the do_brk fix? It's fixed only since 2.4.23 or do I missing something??
> > > Yep > > > > USAGI (IPV6 / Ipsec) will be missing. > > > > superfreeswan (Ipsec) will be missing. > > > > patch-int (crypto modules?) Are now in the official vanilla-kernel > > > > loop-jari (also crypto modules?) Are now in the official > > vanilla-kernel > > > > do_brk_fix.patch is in official-vanilla-tree > > > > If there is interest in these patches I can see what I can do > > That would be fantastic. I'm just hesitant to release a new > alpha-sources that would regress by offering fewer features. If you > manage to add those patches, it would be an easy choice to release > alpha-sources-2.4.23
Ok, I will see what and when I can do it. I think I will build it on top of the XFS patches. Is this ok? And whats about grsec? Should it be included too? Marc -- gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alpha] grsec patch for 2.4.23 with XFS Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>