Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alpha

From: Marc Giger <gigerstyle@×××.ch>
To: gentoo-alpha@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] grsec patch for 2.4.23 with XFS
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:40:46
Message-Id: 20031210234043.4498252d.gigerstyle@gmx.ch
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alpha] grsec patch for 2.4.23 with XFS by Aron Griffis
1 On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:33:58 -0500
2 Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Marc Giger wrote: [Wed Dec 10 2003, 03:23:23PM EST]
5 > > I hope you mean 2.4.21-r1? Never seen a -r2 ebuild
6 >
7 > Right, that's because I forgot to commit it... 6 days ago. It's just
8 > a rev-bump to push out the do_brk fix. I've committed it now.
9
10 Sorry, why to push out the do_brk fix? It's fixed only since 2.4.23
11 or do I missing something??
12
13 >
14 > > Yep
15 > >
16 > > USAGI (IPV6 / Ipsec) will be missing.
17 > >
18 > > superfreeswan (Ipsec) will be missing.
19 > >
20 > > patch-int (crypto modules?) Are now in the official vanilla-kernel
21 > >
22 > > loop-jari (also crypto modules?) Are now in the official
23 > > vanilla-kernel
24 > >
25 > > do_brk_fix.patch is in official-vanilla-tree
26 > >
27 > > If there is interest in these patches I can see what I can do
28 >
29 > That would be fantastic. I'm just hesitant to release a new
30 > alpha-sources that would regress by offering fewer features. If you
31 > manage to add those patches, it would be an easy choice to release
32 > alpha-sources-2.4.23
33
34 Ok, I will see what and when I can do it. I think I will build it on
35 top of the XFS patches. Is this ok?
36 And whats about grsec? Should it be included too?
37
38 Marc
39
40 --
41 gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alpha] grsec patch for 2.4.23 with XFS Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>