| 1 |
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:03:43 -0500 |
| 2 |
"Donsbach, Jeff" <jeff.donsbach@××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Marc, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Help a newbie. ;-) What would be the difference between your 2.4.25 |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Hehe:-) Ok, I will help you if you help me. I saw your e-mail |
| 10 |
address and it seems you are working at hp. The source for alpha's! |
| 11 |
I need more alphas!:-)) EV67 or newer would be cool. So you send me a |
| 12 |
board and a processor (or even better dual) and I will answer your |
| 13 |
question*BIG SMILE |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> ebuild and the current vanilla sources? I've been running a "vanilla |
| 16 |
> source" kernel for a few days and it seems fine to me (in my limited |
| 17 |
> use so far). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
No kidding! If you are happy with vanilla-source I think you won't |
| 20 |
profit from alpha-sources. But it will contain almost the same thing as |
| 21 |
alpha-sources 2.4.21: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
- xfs (useless with 2.4.25) |
| 24 |
- grsecurity |
| 25 |
- usagi |
| 26 |
- cryptoloop-jari |
| 27 |
- superfreeswan |
| 28 |
- uac_sysctl |
| 29 |
- forgot something? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Where usagi and superfreeswan are exclusive |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Additionally I will add acl's (ea+acl+nfsacl) to the tree, because I |
| 34 |
think it's also a very useful security feature. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
greets |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Marc loves his alpha Giger |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list |
Archives