Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:34:31
Message-Id: 20080724123427.GV17546@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue? by Markus Duft
1 On 24-07-2008 14:18:22 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
2 > Hi
3 >
4 > Seems that portage (I have version Portage 2.2.00.11125-prefix) is broken.
5 > Seems that since this version (or maybe a few versions earlier), portage
6 > dooms the environment for fetching files. The environment misses the proxy
7 > variables (http_proxy, ftp_proxy, no_proxy), and thus portage cannot fetch
8 > anything from behind a proxy... it seems that also the PATH variable isn't
9 > set up correctly, since portage misses the wget from it's prefix, and
10 > instead uses another one (cannot tell which one though...)
11 >
12 > Any ideas?
13
14 yes and no.
15 I can't imagine PATH handing having changed, the configuration may be,
16 because I fixed something regarding reading configuration files.
17
18
19 --
20 Fabian Groffen
21 Gentoo on a different level