Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:06:54
Message-Id: 20130128000847.6da39261@carl.erocal.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 by Zac Medico
1 On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:54:59 -0800
2 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 01/27/2013 01:43 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
5 > > On 27-01-2013 22:23:26 +0100, Burcin Erocal wrote:
6 > >> Hi,
7 > >>
8 > >> the following traceback with prefix-portage.2.2.01.21580 was
9 > >> reported by Volker Braun here [1]:
10 > >
11 > > could this bug be related to this?
12 > >
13 > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/454060
14 >
15 > That seems like a separate issue though it involves the same
16 > portage.data.portage_gid proxy object.
17 >
18 > The "TypeError: group id must be integer" thing seems dependent on the
19 > python interpreter, since it works for my in all of the interpreters
20 > that I have installed. See attached test case.
21
22 The problem was with this interpreter:
23
24 Python 2.7.3 (default, Aug 9 2012, 17:23:57)
25 [GCC 4.7.1 20120720 (Red Hat 4.7.1-5)] on linux2
26
27 Perhaps Red Hat patches their python in some way to cause this.
28
29 See here for more output from this interpreter:
30
31 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lmnd-devel/TpP4sEhVFrw/w9yPjQ0f__EJ
32
33
34 Thanks.
35
36 Burcin

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>