1 |
03.02.2015, 03:21, "Michael Weiser" <michael@×××××××××××××××.net>: |
2 |
> Hi Fabian, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 07:20:54PM +0100, Michael Weiser wrote: |
5 |
>>> šupgraded it to anything newer. šWe didn't use csu for a long time, until |
6 |
>>> šI understood why Kito had added the package. šI remember updating CSU a |
7 |
>> šI'm feeling a bit sense here: The system compiler and linker were able |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I meant s/sense/dense/ but now I feel s/dense/groovy/ - cracked it: |
10 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538602 |
11 |
> |
12 |
> ;) |
13 |
> |
14 |
> With this and the other minor darwin8 stuff in the overlay, stage 3 is |
15 |
> now churning along nicely. ;) |
16 |
> |
17 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=537348 |
18 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536894 |
19 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536886 |
20 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538384 |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Bug 537348 brings a nice simplification to the gcc-apple ebuild BTW |
23 |
> because it removes whole blocks for deciding on and importing the older |
24 |
> libstdc++. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Getting clang with LTO going on PPC and maybe even 10.4 doesn't seem all |
27 |
> that mad anymore. ;) |
28 |
|
29 |
FWIW, there is a community working on Clang branch compatible with 10.4: |
30 |
|
31 |
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/ |
32 |
|
33 |
Let me know if you need to test any other ebuilds |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Regards, |
37 |
Konstantin |