Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Markus Duft <mduft@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] non-executable
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:21:58
Message-Id: 1242641606.30102.4.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] non-executable by Fabian Groffen
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:56 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 18-05-2009 10:39:44 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: > > > Maybe this is something totally different, but doesn't the > > > eclass/portage somewhere *remove* the executable bit of shared > > > libraries? > > > > hmm. have to look that up, but i guess what you mean is the handling > > of .la files?. however it is strange because it is the _only_ .so that > > is not executable. and of course non-executable shared libraries don't > > work. > > > > i'd like to avoid a chmod a+x :) > > Please check and >
mhm, right; /opt/gentoo/usr/lib/portage/bin/ (install_qa_check()) does all i want, and the code seems to be well-written enough to get*, and make it executable. however it doesn't (and as i said, libintl is the only one) :( . also it seems portage calls install_qa_check rather unconditionally, so it shouldn't be the case that any pre_src_install (or any other hook) makes the call to the function disappear. I'll do further investigation. Cheers, Markus


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] non-executable Markus Duft <mduft@g.o>