Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: simple question about installing chromium browser for use in debian OS using gentoo prefix..
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:25:07
Message-Id: 20190628102500.GR86865@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: simple question about installing chromium browser for use in debian OS using gentoo prefix.. by Michael Fothergill
1 Then now it should be as chromium wants it to be ...
2
3 I'll keep my fingers crossed it works this time.
4
5 Fabian
6
7 On 28-06-2019 11:22:37 +0100, Michael Fothergill wrote:
8 > I ran the chmod 4755 command again and now there is an "s" present......
9 >
10 > mikef@fart:~/gentoo/etc/portage$ !472
11 > ls -la /home/mikef/gentoo/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/chrome-sandbox
12 > -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 22384 Jun 26 01:52
13 > /home/mikef/gentoo/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/chrome-sandbox
14 >
15 > Regards
16 >
17 > MF
18 >
19 > On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 11:19, Fabian Groffen <[1]grobian@g.o> wrote:
20 >
21 > > chmod 4755 the file again, and check ls -la
22 >
23 > > On 28-06-2019 10:11:06 +0100, Michael Fothergill wrote:
24 > > > Many thanks again.
25 > > >
26 > > > I ran the command to list the chromium sand box file:
27 > > >
28 > > > mikef@fart:~/gentoo/etc/portage$ ls -la
29 > > > /home/mikef/gentoo/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/chrome-sandbox
30 > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22384 Jun 26 01:52
31 > > > /home/mikef/gentoo/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/chrome-sandbox
32 > > > mikef@fart:~/gentoo/etc/portage$
33 > > >
34 > > > I don't see any "s" in it but it is owned by root.
35 > > >
36 > > > Regards
37 > > >
38 > > > MF
39 > > >
40 > > >
41 > > > read_char: errno==EILSEQ; invalid byte sequence for UTF-8:
42 > > --
43 > > Fabian Groffen
44 > > Gentoo on a different level
45 >
46 >
47 >
48 > References:
49 > 1. mailto:grobian@g.o
50 >
51 > read_char: errno==EILSEQ; invalid byte sequence for UTF-8:
52 --
53 Fabian Groffen
54 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies