1 |
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 18:34 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 08-10-2008 10:38:45 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > > Currently, keywords indicate: |
6 |
> > > x86: "this runs on [x86] CPU with [Gentoo Linux] OS" |
7 |
> > > x86-fbsd: "this runs on [x86] CPU with [FreeBSD] OS" |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > May I kindly bring up that point that even in gentoo-x86 tree, x86 == |
10 |
> > x86-linux etc. -linux is the default and the omission of it implies |
11 |
> > just that. So, for prefix keywords, do you really want to go down the |
12 |
> > road of... x86+$OS. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > x86 == x86-linux != x86+linux |
15 |
|
16 |
Depends on the definition: |
17 |
x86: "Gentoo Linux" |
18 |
x86-linux: "non-prefixed Gentoo on any Linux" |
19 |
x86+linux: "Gentoo Prefix on any Linux" |
20 |
|
21 |
The *+* is only because there is non-Prefix *-fbsd already. |
22 |
|
23 |
And "Gentoo Linux" != "non-prefixed Gentoo on any Linux" != "Gentoo |
24 |
Prefix on any Linux" |
25 |
|
26 |
The problem is how to distinguish |
27 |
between "non-prefixed Gentoo on FreeBSD" (keyword "*-fbsd") |
28 |
and "Gentoo Prefix on FreeBSD" (keyword "*-fbsd" in Prefix ATM) |
29 |
|
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > Just confusing IMO. |
32 |
|
33 |
Agreed. |
34 |
|
35 |
> |
36 |
> Yeah, and to me still an overloading of the keywording thing with Prefix |
37 |
> stuff. PROPERTIES=prefix would be more to my liking. |
38 |
|
39 |
Ok with me eventually to indicate prefix-awareness, but it does not fix |
40 |
the *-fbsd (prefix <> non-prefix) problem, as they still would share the |
41 |
same keyword. |
42 |
|
43 |
/haubi/ |
44 |
-- |
45 |
Michael Haubenwallner |
46 |
Gentoo on a different level |