Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] the future of Prefix
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 06:40:21
Message-Id: 1223534399.15256.25.camel@salomon-22
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] the future of Prefix by Fabian Groffen
1 On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 18:34 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
2 > On 08-10-2008 10:38:45 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
3 > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@g.o> wrote:
4 > >
5 > > > Currently, keywords indicate:
6 > > > x86: "this runs on [x86] CPU with [Gentoo Linux] OS"
7 > > > x86-fbsd: "this runs on [x86] CPU with [FreeBSD] OS"
8 > >
9 > > May I kindly bring up that point that even in gentoo-x86 tree, x86 ==
10 > > x86-linux etc. -linux is the default and the omission of it implies
11 > > just that. So, for prefix keywords, do you really want to go down the
12 > > road of... x86+$OS.
13 > >
14 > > x86 == x86-linux != x86+linux
15
16 Depends on the definition:
17 x86: "Gentoo Linux"
18 x86-linux: "non-prefixed Gentoo on any Linux"
19 x86+linux: "Gentoo Prefix on any Linux"
20
21 The *+* is only because there is non-Prefix *-fbsd already.
22
23 And "Gentoo Linux" != "non-prefixed Gentoo on any Linux" != "Gentoo
24 Prefix on any Linux"
25
26 The problem is how to distinguish
27 between "non-prefixed Gentoo on FreeBSD" (keyword "*-fbsd")
28 and "Gentoo Prefix on FreeBSD" (keyword "*-fbsd" in Prefix ATM)
29
30 > >
31 > > Just confusing IMO.
32
33 Agreed.
34
35 >
36 > Yeah, and to me still an overloading of the keywording thing with Prefix
37 > stuff. PROPERTIES=prefix would be more to my liking.
38
39 Ok with me eventually to indicate prefix-awareness, but it does not fix
40 the *-fbsd (prefix <> non-prefix) problem, as they still would share the
41 same keyword.
42
43 /haubi/
44 --
45 Michael Haubenwallner
46 Gentoo on a different level

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] the future of Prefix Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>