Archives
Archives
| From: | Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:08:11 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAMxqorWWGry=xuZY5vrcJcO42-uOLOy+sDnPNWEJp5TTnBnpHA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ? by Alan Hourihane |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 | > Hi all, |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > I talked to Jeremy about this last night, but it seems perl 5.16.x |
| 5 | > hasn't been adjusted for Prefix. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > The patches aren't applied and it's a much reduced ebuild. Has anyone |
| 8 | > tested 5.16.x on prefix yet ? |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > Thanks, |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > Alan. |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Oh yes, perl-5.16 definately works just fine. I never said that it didn't =P |
| 16 | -Jeremy |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-alt] Perl 5.16.x on Prefix ? | Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> |