| 1 |
Hello Han, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:31:02PM +0000, Han H. wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Yes /usr/include is there. I am not able to install mac packages so an update must not be run by me. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> $ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx |
| 8 |
> xcode-select: error: tool 'xcodebuild' requires Xcode, but active developer directory '/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools' is a command line tools instance |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think thats your problem right there. Think about this sequence of |
| 11 |
commands: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
osx:~ amichael$ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx Path |
| 14 |
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.11.sdk |
| 15 |
osx:~ amichael$ sudo xcode-select -s /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools |
| 16 |
osx:~ amichael$ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx Path |
| 17 |
xcode-select: error: tool 'xcodebuild' requires Xcode, but active developer directory '/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools' is a command line tools instance |
| 18 |
osx:~ amichael$ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx Path 2>/dev/null |
| 19 |
osx:~ amichael$ echo $? |
| 20 |
1 |
| 21 |
osx:~ amichael$ sudo xcode-select -s /Applications/Xcode.app |
| 22 |
osx:~ amichael$ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx Path 2>/dev/null |
| 23 |
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.11.sdk |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
So just have someone with sudo/root access on the box fix up the Xcode |
| 26 |
installation using a command like: |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
sudo xcode-select -s /Applications/Xcode.app |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
... and you should be all set. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> I saw in the check |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> -- Finding valid architectures for osx... |
| 35 |
> -- OSX supported arches: i386;x86_64;x86_64h |
| 36 |
> -- Finding valid architectures for 10.4... |
| 37 |
> -- OSX 10.4 supported arches: i386;x86_64;x86_64h |
| 38 |
> -- Compiler-RT supported architectures: i386;x86_64;x86_64h |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
> does that mean it detects my system is 10.4? |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
No, they've got workarounds for functions that hadn't been invented yet |
| 43 |
on 10.4. I guess they're detecting what platforms they need to compile |
| 44 |
those for. I think you can ignore that. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
> I also tried 3.8.1-r2 but same thing happens. llvm-3.9.0_rc3 requires |
| 47 |
> more upgrade (cmake...) and not sure if uncomplete upgrade (if cmake |
| 48 |
> updates and llvm remains 3.7.1) will cause a broken toolchain. |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
My compile of 3.8.1 went fine, BTW. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
BTW: I'll be out on holiday starting now. So sorry if you have followup |
| 53 |
questions and I don't respond for a while. |
| 54 |
-- |
| 55 |
bye, Michael |
| 56 |
weiser.dinsnail.net/ |
Archives