| 1 |
I had the same problem. Your fixes have worked for me. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Thanks Fabian. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Matt. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On 6 September 2016 at 17:55, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Han, |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Does it work for you now with my fixes? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Thanks, |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Fabian |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> On 04-09-2016 17:06:56 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 19 |
> > Han, Michael, |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > I've got the exact same scenario on my El Capitan. With the help of |
| 22 |
> > Michael's pointers, I managed to track down what goes wrong. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > Michael pointed out there is a call to some function that will return an |
| 25 |
> > empty string for systems where xcodebuild barfs, and the later code |
| 26 |
> > checks if the variable is set. Obviously it is (to an empty string), |
| 27 |
> > with a result of "-isysroot". |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> > I've patched the function to return / in case xcodebuild returns nothing |
| 30 |
> > useful, such that we fall back to /usr/include, which makes the whole |
| 31 |
> > thing compile for me. |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > Fabian |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > On 02-09-2016 19:31:02 +0000, Han H. wrote: |
| 36 |
> > > Hi Michael, |
| 37 |
> > > |
| 38 |
> > > Yes /usr/include is there. I am not able to install mac packages so an |
| 39 |
> > > update must not be run by me. |
| 40 |
> > > |
| 41 |
> > > $ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx |
| 42 |
> > > xcode-select: error: tool 'xcodebuild' requires Xcode, but active |
| 43 |
> developer |
| 44 |
> > > directory '/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools' is a command line |
| 45 |
> tools |
| 46 |
> > > instance |
| 47 |
> > > |
| 48 |
> > > I saw in the check |
| 49 |
> > > |
| 50 |
> > > -- Finding valid architectures for osx... |
| 51 |
> > > -- OSX supported arches: i386;x86_64;x86_64h |
| 52 |
> > > -- Finding valid architectures for 10.4... |
| 53 |
> > > -- OSX 10.4 supported arches: i386;x86_64;x86_64h |
| 54 |
> > > -- Compiler-RT supported architectures: i386;x86_64;x86_64h |
| 55 |
> > > |
| 56 |
> > > does that mean it detects my system is 10.4? |
| 57 |
> > > |
| 58 |
> > > I also tried 3.8.1-r2 but same thing happens. llvm-3.9.0_rc3 requires |
| 59 |
> more |
| 60 |
> > > upgrade (cmake...) and not sure if uncomplete upgrade (if cmake |
| 61 |
> updates and |
| 62 |
> > > llvm remains 3.7.1) will cause a broken toolchain. |
| 63 |
> > > |
| 64 |
> > > Thanks, |
| 65 |
> > > Han |
| 66 |
> > > |
| 67 |
> > |
| 68 |
> > -- |
| 69 |
> > Fabian Groffen |
| 70 |
> > Gentoo on a different level |
| 71 |
> |
| 72 |
> |
| 73 |
> |
| 74 |
> -- |
| 75 |
> Fabian Groffen |
| 76 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
| 77 |
> |
Archives