| 1 |
Sorry for the delay. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 05-11-2008 03:02:34 -0700, David Hubbard wrote: |
| 4 |
> John, Fabian, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I got the cannot compute sizeof (long long) error when attempting to |
| 7 |
> build sys-devel/gcc-apple-4.2.1_p5564 on OS X 10.4.11 (intel), and |
| 8 |
> found the discussion on gentoo-alt. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Though I can't say what the "unknown one-operand" error is (in |
| 11 |
> config.log), here is the patch that adds a call to dsymutil there: |
| 12 |
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00057.html |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And a follow-up which may indicate dsymutil isn't really the right solution: |
| 15 |
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-10/msg00083.html |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> So I reverted the part of the patch that calls dsymutil, and the |
| 18 |
> ebuild now works. (Patches attached) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Wow, thanks! That's very nice work! |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> Thus I would call it a gcc bug, but only a gcc-apple-4.2.1 bug on OS X |
| 23 |
> 10.4.11, and the revert leaves the original problem of finding the |
| 24 |
> dsym folder for objects packaged in a library. And none of this |
| 25 |
> applies on 10.5 and above. So all in all, not worth mentioning to the |
| 26 |
> gcc developers. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I prefer to call it a gcc-apple-4.2.1 bug on OSX 10.4/x86, as it works |
| 29 |
for me on 10.4/ppc. 10.5 indeed is unaffected. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Why is the -no-dynamic thing necessary? For bootstrapping? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> P.S. Please CC me on the gentoo-alt thread |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 41 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives