1 |
On 12-06-2008 09:49:41 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> Rather peculiar problem that I ran across while bootstrapping a new |
4 |
> prefix on amd64-linux. We *do* want usr/lib symlinked to usr/lib64, |
5 |
> yes? |
6 |
|
7 |
Originally, yes. However, I would like amd64-linux in prefix to behave |
8 |
like any other installation, hence just use lib and usr/lib (die |
9 |
multilib die) like we do on x64-solaris as well. |
10 |
|
11 |
> How come it doesn't get symlinked by default and what do we need to do |
12 |
> to fix it? |
13 |
|
14 |
There used to be a bug on it, I guess I thought it was fixed, but it |
15 |
pops up again. baselayout-prefix should do this. |
16 |
|
17 |
> %% pwd |
18 |
> /home/jolexa/portage/linux-64/usr |
19 |
> %% ls lib |
20 |
> gcc/ portage/ |
21 |
> %% ls lib64 |
22 |
> binutils/ libltdl.so.3@ libpopt.so@ |
23 |
> engines/ libltdl.so.3.1.6* libpopt.so.0@ |
24 |
> <snip> |
25 |
|
26 |
That feels no good. Maybe we can just investigate how to get rid of |
27 |
lib64 in amd64-linux profiles, as part of a nice summer-cleaning in |
28 |
linux land. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Fabian Groffen |
33 |
Gentoo on a different level |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |