| 1 |
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/21/12 15:34, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Hi all, |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> I talked to Jeremy about this last night, but it seems perl 5.16.x |
| 7 |
>>> hasn't been adjusted for Prefix. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> The patches aren't applied and it's a much reduced ebuild. Has anyone |
| 10 |
>>> tested 5.16.x on prefix yet ? |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> Thanks, |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> Alan. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> Oh yes, perl-5.16 definately works just fine. I never said that it didn't =P |
| 17 |
> Sure, but my question was that I can't see where the patches are applied |
| 18 |
> via the eblits for prefix, which you didn't seem to know. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Alan. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
The patches are here, not sure where the source SCM is though. |
| 24 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tove/distfiles/dev-lang/perl/perl-5.16.1-1.tar.bz2 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-Jeremy |
Archives