| 1 |
On 06/06/2010 12:43 PM, mattmatteh@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Hi, |
| 5 |
>> Current situation is to mask packages that run as root. I'm seriously |
| 6 |
>> considering to lift this restriction because: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> 1) We aren't very good at keeping this list up2date. |
| 9 |
>> 2) It poses artificial restrictions for some users and doens't harm the |
| 10 |
>> other users. |
| 11 |
>> 3) Why bother to mask them? |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Anyone disagree? |
| 14 |
>> -Jeremy |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> running as root still works ? i suppose ther could be the case where |
| 17 |
> root could have a prefix ? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> matt |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The thread should really be called "packages that need root privs to |
| 23 |
run" and we have now had enough feedback that I am moving forward this |
| 24 |
week on it. :) |
| 25 |
-Jeremy |
Archives