| 1 |
Hi François,
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
François Bissey <francois.bissey@×××××××××××××.nz> writes:
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> I have been experimenting putting RAP on |
| 6 |
> a fresh SLES11SP1 install on ppc64... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Is it SUSE 11.1? Is the closest community distribution OpenSUSE-11.1?
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
We have only tested on OpenSUSE-42.1[1]. It is nice to have another test
|
| 11 |
environment.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SUSE_Linux_distributions
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Yes it is not supported by default I realised |
| 16 |
> pretty fast. After generating a profile that |
| 17 |
> looked OK I moved on the various stages. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
No problem, that means we have new things to play with :)
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The profile is relatived to the gcc failure below. Could you please
|
| 22 |
show in detail the profile you created?
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> My first real issue was building sed in stage 1. |
| 25 |
> I had to compile xz and link to /usr/bin for |
| 26 |
> the latest sed to unpack without error. |
| 27 |
> There should probably be some dependency there |
| 28 |
> since `xz` was merged a few minutes later. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Similarly bison initially failed because I didn't |
| 31 |
> have help2man installed on the host system. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> I had to keyword baselayout-prefix ~ppc64. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> But all those are quite minor overall, |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Yeah. Let's upstream them for a better ppc64 support in the future.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
> so I am now in stage 3 and gcc-5.4.0-r2 fails to build. It fails |
| 40 |
> during its own "stage 2" with: build/genmatch --gimple |
| 41 |
> /shared/work_no_backup/ppc64-prefix/tmp/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r2/work/gcc-5.4.0/gcc/match.pd |
| 42 |
> \ |
| 43 |
> > tmp-gimple-match.c |
| 44 |
> build/genmatch: /lib64/ld64.so.1: version `GLIBC_2.22' not found |
| 45 |
> (required by build/genmatch) |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
The compiled elf does not have interpreter field prefixed. It should be
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
$EPREFIX/lib64/ld64.so.1 (gentoo glibc) instead of /lib64/ld64.so.1 (host glibc)
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
> make[3]: *** [s-match] Error 1 |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
> so it didn't look for my RAP glibc are there |
| 54 |
> any RAP specific patches that are applied to |
| 55 |
> gcc? |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
The hack are in
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/profiles/prefix/linux-standalone/profile.bashrc
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
esp. line 14.
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
Yours,
|
| 64 |
Benda
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
1. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Prefix/libc#Tested_distributions |
Archives