Archives
Archives
| From: | Al <oss.elmar@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-alt] Re: Prefix/Cygwin: stability | ||
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:58:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | AANLkTimzDjD8zQNXbN3=--2_QNm-pOXfXUif6gmSYhtQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-alt] Prefix/Cygwin: stability by Al |
||
| 1 | 2010/9/12 Al <oss.elmar@××××××××××.com>: |
| 2 | > I want to file in a few postings now. They are mainly targeted for the |
| 3 | > archives, but also to communicate knowlege on Cygwin. Sure your |
| 4 | > annotations are welcome. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > 95% stability |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Meanwhile I think the stabilitly is higher than this. When I emerge |
| 10 | bzip2 as one of the first packages, there are good chances that a full |
| 11 | system build will go through without breaking. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Al |