Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Joey Dumont <joey.dumont@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Is should bootstrapping Prefix with a host glibc newer than stage3 glibc (be) possible?
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 01:35:07
Message-Id: CAB6-_ifjqWqc=Z0Ld_hcAfyxKNWS3fsgdFtisYFUSSN=4dFZXA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Is should bootstrapping Prefix with a host glibc newer than stage3 glibc (be) possible? by Benda Xu
1 Done: https://bugs.gentoo.org/770334
2
3 Thanks!
4
5 Joey Dumont (Profile <http://blog.joey-dumont.ca/>)
6 The supreme elegance of Nature lies in its apparent simplicity.
7
8
9 On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 20:06, Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> wrote:
10
11 > Hi Joey,
12 >
13 > Joey Dumont <joey.dumont@×××××.com> writes:
14 >
15 > > I just tried to bootstrap on Arch Linux that has glibc-2.33 with the
16 > bootstrap-prefix.sh from commit 6cc6d48909. The
17 > > bootstrap errors out during the stage3 compilation of glibc-2.32-r7:
18 > >
19 > > [...]
20 > > * ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo failed (compile phase):
21 > >
22 > > Is this a bug? Or is bootstrap expected to fail when the host glibc is
23 > > newer?
24 >
25 > This is a bug, please file a report. There should be no restrictions
26 > on the host glibc version.
27 >
28 > Benda
29 >
30 >