| 1 |
Hi Benda, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Thanks for testing. I don't have an idea. I also tried Prefix x86 on |
| 6 |
> Debian amd64, and Prefix x86 on Debian i386. Both of them work. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> Now I do have a functioning prefix on this debian box with gcc-4.9.3 installed. |
| 9 |
>> But I have to jump through hoops to install it. I suspect that something |
| 10 |
>> on the host is interfering with things. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> So you tried to bootstrap RAP from gcc-4.9.3 and got the same result? |
| 13 |
> Interesting, that implies the bug is not due to host gcc. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I guess, I wasn't real clear. My prefix is one that I had previously. |
| 16 |
It had its own glibc and was transitioned to: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
gentoo_prefix:prefix/linux-standalone/amd64 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-alt@l.g.o/msg07188.html |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
It's the one that uses gcc-4.9.3. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Benda |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Steve |
Archives