| 1 |
On 07-10-2009 10:19:24 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 10:55 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 06-10-2009 22:50:30 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > yeah, but back then it didn't rm -Rf internal/libffi |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Can we put the ~m68k-mint back in ?? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > I will just make the python ebuild not depend on libffi for m68k-mint |
| 9 |
> > again. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Thanks. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > > Is portage going to be using features from libffi ?? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > I hope not. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I'm a little puzzled why this isn't a USE flag if it's not being forced |
| 18 |
> on us. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
we are in the same boat, unfortunately... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 25 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives