| 1 |
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:11 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09-10-2008 08:39:59 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Depends on the definition: |
| 4 |
> > x86: "Gentoo Linux" |
| 5 |
> > x86-linux: "non-prefixed Gentoo on any Linux" |
| 6 |
> > x86+linux: "Gentoo Prefix on any Linux" |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > The *+* is only because there is non-Prefix *-fbsd already. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > And "Gentoo Linux" != "non-prefixed Gentoo on any Linux" != "Gentoo |
| 11 |
> > Prefix on any Linux" |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > The problem is how to distinguish |
| 14 |
> > between "non-prefixed Gentoo on FreeBSD" (keyword "*-fbsd") |
| 15 |
> > and "Gentoo Prefix on FreeBSD" (keyword "*-fbsd" in Prefix ATM) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Not a problem, as in Prefix, it would be x86-freebsd, because people |
| 18 |
> convinced me that fbsd is too short and causing inconsistencies, because |
| 19 |
> nbsd or obsd would have multiple candidates. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Ah, ok then - sorry, didn't look at current prefix' arch.list. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Should we want "non-prefixed Gentoo on any platform" to be deprecated? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
/haubi/ |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Michael Haubenwallner |
| 28 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives