| 1 |
On 09-11-2010 10:42:41 +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> 07.11.2010, 18:51, "Konstantin Tokarev" <annulen@××××××.ru>: |
| 5 |
> > Hi all, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > It seems to me like many packages working on ppc-macos are not keyworded |
| 8 |
> > But package working on ppc and x86-macos or x86_64-macos is likely to be |
| 9 |
> > working for ppc-macos (also, package working for x86 and ppc-macos will work |
| 10 |
> > on x86-macos, and so on) |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Maybe it's worth to add special mode to portage-prefix accepting such keyword |
| 13 |
> > combinations (e.g., when some option is specified in emerge command line)? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Also, I suppose ppc64-macos = ppc64 && X-macos (X - some other arch). It would |
| 16 |
> be useful for those who tries ppc64-macos prefix because too few packages are |
| 17 |
> keyworded |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
actually none are keyworded ppc64-macos. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
It is not safe to assume that what compiles on ppc(-linux) also compiles |
| 22 |
on ppc-macos. While it is likely that *-macos all or none compile, it |
| 23 |
is also best to first verify that, before assuming it is. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> Regards, |
| 27 |
> Konstantin |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 32 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives