From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? | ||
Date: | Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:52:55 | ||
Message-Id: | 20110831185230.GP42206@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? by Burcin Erocal |
1 | On 31-08-2011 15:09:45 +0200, Burcin Erocal wrote: |
2 | > > Aha. That explains. Now I understand why the fix fixes it as well. |
3 | > > I'll apply it ASAP. Thanks a lot! |
4 | > |
5 | > A better fix might be to replace the + at the end of line 163 with \. |
6 | > This way the parser concatenates the strings and we don't introduce an |
7 | > extra operation. :) |
8 | |
9 | Since I'm a Python n00b, please tell me if |
10 | http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commitdiff;h=5551d449dffe531935dcd672f37c5cd3abd55a44;hp=3b74444f6684d7696e549cbdb76b8d1a0795fe2d |
11 | is supposedly what you meant it to be. |
12 | |
13 | Thanks! |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | Fabian Groffen |
18 | Gentoo on a different level |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? | Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org> |