| 1 |
On 28-08-2009 10:08:11 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 2 |
> > I guess the problem is more why it wants to remove that /usr. Maybe |
| 3 |
> > because of the same problem we once had during install, where paths |
| 4 |
> > "below" the offset prefix shouldn't be taken into account at all, |
| 5 |
> > because you should not do anything there, and may not even be able to do |
| 6 |
> > so. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> All you need to do is look at the CONTENTS file which as something like |
| 9 |
> this... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> dir /usr |
| 12 |
> dir /usr/bin |
| 13 |
> obj /usr/bin/comm 4e28628520359733270907c62c738b3f 1250795126 |
| 14 |
> obj /usr/bin/arch 59d8b1d83cfbc020751c8febc4706901 1250795126 |
| 15 |
> obj /usr/bin/factor a68ac36164e0ac5c1245e358e688942e 1250795126 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Look at the first line.... Enough said... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
right, but your prefix is '/', so that makes sense. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
the "fix" is most probably that portage shouldn't remove a symlink if it |
| 22 |
expects a dir. Put differently, portage should ensure that it only |
| 23 |
unmerges what it expects. Would that theory work? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 28 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives